06 April 2020

Skills and funding update for the funded adult education sector



COVID-19 remains the headline for the moment


We have had several announcements from the government and the adult education sector representatives thus far and I’m sure more will come. The month of April will clearly bring many further announcements as we go further into the crisis but one of the key announcements happened a few weeks now and was welcomed by the sector. That is that the monitoring of delivery processes has been put on hold in this difficult period, including halting Ofsted inspections and ESFA Audits for now.

Despite the uncertainty there has been some assurances from the powers that be, and in this respect for some skills providers there is some positive news with the release of the Procurement Policy Note 02/20 Supplier relief. This document is the guidance from government which will result in on-programme payments for AEB, ESF and apprenticeships for all providers based on recent performance. For providers delivering Adult Learner Loans there has been no announcements (yet) about the approach that will be adopted here, but that Is expected to hopefully come soon. 


 
With these updates most providers have a certain level of security for their next few months, albeit the funds will be reconciled with a reconciliation processes that’s likely to take place in the new academic year and will be accounted for then.

 

In other news that may have been overlooked in the last few weeks Apprenticeship achievement rates have fallen although not as much as was expected! The National Achievement Rates showing 66.9% 2017/18 to 64.7% 2018/19 and many people in the sector were celebrating the less than expected reduction. From what we can gather from the data is that the sector is still generally struggling with the introduction of standards with the achievement rate for framework apprenticeships in 2018/19 at 68.7%, in comparison to 46.6% for standards.

Prior to the recent turmoil – the official unemployment rates were low by historical standards and the main issue was “under-employment”, particularly amongst graduates as this was at an all-time high. The focus as identified in the Budget 2020  and again for most people this seems like a distant past, this  budget  had a focus to support people to improve their skills to level up opportunity across the country and thereby Increasing productivity,  and this depends on improving the skills levels of this generation and the next.
The plans for the government where to facilitate two culture changes: for individuals to be able to train and retrain over the course of their lifetimes; and for employers and the government to increase investment and fill the skills gaps that hold back productivity at a local, regional and national level.
In practical terms the ‘skills progression ladder’ is a focus to be rebalanced towards higher technical qualifications at Levels 4 and 5 as well as ensuring the qualifications at Level 3 and below are there to climb up.




When the facts change then our plan and priorities need to change, we hope the skills ladder ambition hasn’t completely out of the window but certainly  there will be some adjustment of priorities as the Department for Work and Pensions revealed last week  an alarming record number of people had applied for universal credit benefits. The figures stated we that they were 950,000 applications between 16 March, when people were encouraged to work from home, and the end of the month. The department said it would normally expect around 100,000 claims in a two-week period. Some of the more detrimental predictions go far as to say unemployment could rapidly rise to more than 6 million people, around 21 per cent of the entire workforce. 


In addition, with the business closures predicted to be as much as 1 in 5 in some cases and the falling levels of confidence, many are already predicting a bleak outlook, young people and those in lower paid roles working in leisure, retail and hospitality sectors are likely to be impacted the most and will need government focus and priority and in this respect they will reach out to welfare to work and adult education sector for a substantive amount of the work.
In terms of present issues from a sector perspective there is the concern where employed learners including Apprentices are furloughed which in effect is a leave of absence or placed on unpaid leave, or where the nature of their employment changes and no longer supports their course or apprenticeship. The general guidance from Association of Employment & Learning Providers (AELP) is  for learning providers to continue to support furloughed workers and only resort to using an official break in learning if the learner doesn’t want to undertake any training whilst they are temporarily stood down from work. Hopefully most people will be keen to carry on and make use of this time and see it as an opportunity for them.

For Guidance and information, the Department for Education has launched a new helpline to answer questions about COVID-19 related to education. Staff, parents and young people, more information can be found here:
In addition, guidance for employees, employers and businesses on Coronavirus (COVID-19) is as below:

Moving on, the Department of Education has issued the latest advice pertaining to apprenticeship training providers and End point Assessment organisations (EPAOs).   It states that in order to support the sector during any disruption, the initial recommendations is that there is a need for everyone (employer, provider, EPAO, Apprentice) to take a reasonable and balanced approach in these situations and to recognise that the health and wellbeing of individuals is a higher priority than performance measures. Good communications between each of these parties is important to the successful delivery of EPA anyway. So, in these circumstances that communication becomes even more important.
Learning providers wherever possible should continue to deliver especially where remote and other such methods is allowable. This includes completing and signing learners as complete where activities can be conducted remotely, with the agreement of the apprentice, employer and provider.

Where there is a will there's a way, the sector as a whole has stepped up in the last few weeks and there has been impressive stories on LinkedIn and other mediums about providers across the country and how they have reacted and adapted to this “unprecedented “ change.

This period is an opportunity to implement and adjust to new approaches and continue to inspire and engage adults in learning. I can say that first-hand from our organisation that we have looked at practical and pragmatic solutions whilst remaining positive. The digital transformation journey that we were on, like many other providers has been fast tracked – including where needed delivering learner responsive and learner specific resources to continue with the aim to deliver programmes for all learners.

In addition to offering support for the community and stepping up communication flow with all stakeholders, there has been a concerted effort from many to work together as one and support each other across the sector to mitigate the impacts of Covid-19 on our team members, learners, employers and our business itself. The words every cloud has a silver lining come to mind.

Safaraz Ali


 

02 April 2020

SOCIAL CARE PROVIDER RESILIENCE DURING COVID-19



For far too long the health and social care sector has been Inadequately funded and undervalued.  In this national crisis the impact and contribution the sector makes to the welfare of us all has been appreciated by the public and recognised by the government.

Care staff and the businesses that provide this invaluable service whether they are care homes or home care providers are truly unsung heroes – “Hats off” to you all.




This is general advice piece written with the basic aim to assist with the pressures that our Health and Social Care Providers are facing from the COVID-19 situation and it is aimed at Leaders within the sector.

In the past Care Providers have experienced many threats and challenges and generally are known to be very resilient in nature. The situation as a sector we now face is very much different, and we all need to be able to support each other as much as possible and truly work together to move forward.


So, let’s begin with the first thing to consider.



1.Communication, in fact, I will go far as to say:

Communication first, second & third!

At all level’s individuals need the ability to raise issues and get answers quickly, and to be able to solve problems where possible,
collaboratively, both internally across your business and externally.

Health and Social Care Leaders should support collaborative working by ensuring that there is frequent and easy flow communication,
My general advice is that this needs to be practical, pragmatic as well as positive.

I would suggest you need to encourage all individuals:
that they need to take responsibility
that they know where to access and refer relevant information,
and what the state of play is at all times,

In addition to what the focus and the priorities are so that we can all ensure that we are all doing our bit! 




2. Business Continuity Plans – this is No Longer about a “Tick Box” exercise

Good business continuity planning assists resilience and should therefore be in place. The business continuity plan (BCP) need to be updated and worked on in a collaborative way rather than in Silos.

Every Leader within the business should have their own action and Business Continuity Plans that is produced as a working document and not as a “Tick Box” Document.

I would suggest and generally encourage Board Members and Executives within a business that they should if possible, avoid routine information requests unless there is an intention to analyse the plans and offer constructive guidance.

We need to recognise that some aspects of the plans rely on support from others such as Heads of IT, the Finance Team and possibly outside partners as well.

Where it’s deemed possible – a provider should also offer help to peers – other care providers by discussing/sharing their own local resilience plans and discussing any wider considerations such as transport or school closures.





3. Cashflow is King:
We need to recognise that reduced cash flow will especially impact home care providers, as they are usually expected to submit itemised invoices of hours delivered for each person.
In such cases there may be a time lag of up to eight weeks between delivery of support and payment to the provider.
Delays in invoicing, invoice disputes and non- payment of invoices will have a serious negative impact on providers’ cashflow – The providers finance Team need to plan quickly and manage in detail daily and weekly activity.

In this period there are some local authorities that have offered some structured upfront payment

If you as the provider are lucky enough to get an upfront payment then this needs to monitored to ensure the hours delivered tally with the hours paid as this can easily get out of sync.


Cashflow can also affect Residential Care Homes,  it may be possible that local government will offer support by paying on the planned support for people in given care homes and the reconciling for any adjustments due to deaths or other factors. This is even more important as occupancy levels may become more volatile, with potentially more voids due to infection control measures possible offset by extra demand.


4. Retrospective reconciliation – It’s going to happen!
Any payments overpaid will be reconciled - Where the time comes this needs to be handled transparently and with open and frank discussion.

Reconciliation is likely when actual levels of support differ markedly from what was planned and these needs to managed in the budgets of all providers.

All Health Care Providers should be mindful of all the extra costs they are incurring during this period, and of problems they may face in reducing variable costs in such a volatile operating environment.

As a Provider you should also be mindful that, where actual support levels are significantly below plan, then the commissioners may have needed to fund support elsewhere.


5. Sick Pay- the changing landscape
Health Care Providers face increased cost pressures due to higher sickness absence rates among their workforce: you may need to pay staff Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) or make sickness payments at a higher level than SSP because they have a contractual sick pay scheme (also known as an ‘occupational scheme’), which offer workers payments above the basic minimum amount of SSP, which is £94.25 per week.

When emergency legislation is passed, employers’ liability for SSP will start at day one rather than day four, and requirements for workers to self-isolate will further increase financial pressures. Given that in virtually all cases providers will have to backfill sickness absence to ensure continued delivery of support, this represents a real cost pressure on providers.

Please note that care provider employers are unable to reclaim payments for SSP from Government, except for some temporary arrangements announced in the Spring Budget, which will only be available to organisations with 250 or fewer employees.

Our suggestion is that Health Care Provider should lobby to mitigate this by requesting funding for these extra costs and push for either a lump sum payment or through increasing the fee rate.
It’s possible that the local authority can assist with cash flow by agreeing a reasonable amount based on an assumed average sickness absence rate and paying upfront, rather than awaiting detailed records of actual sickness taken and backfill provided and agree reasonable and proportionate ways of later reconciliation. Each Local authority will have their own approach and this issue needs to be highlighted to get this resolved.



6. Workforce availability  & Management
There is no doubt that Health Care Providers will face higher workforce absence rates, through medically recommended self-isolation, sickness and family caring responsibilities.
Other factors, such as the possibility of school closures, may exacerbate this issue. Care providers will need to be able to deploy their staff flexibly and to hire new staff quickly. It’s possible that you may face increased cost pressures from higher use of agency staff.

My suggestion is that here again the Local authority should be lobbied and made aware to assist with these extra cost pressures.
Some Commissioner are allowing flexibility for providers in hiring and deploying staff, for example allowing recruits to begin working after a DBS Adult First check has been obtained, rather than insisting the full DBS checks are returned before a worker can begin providing care, or by allowing staff to be deployed across different care settings or between care providers.


7. Rapid  Response & Adjustment of Support
Generally, support will have to be rapidly adjusted. People will be admitted to hospital, care visits changed to meet the most urgent needs and some homecare visits will take longer due to infection control precautions and the availability of staff.  In addition, care homes may need to adjust support in order to meet changing needs and to minimise infection risks.
This means that rapid decisions will need to be taken by care providers about appropriate adjustments of care packages. This will likely increase your costs as it will require extra management time to make these adjustments. There is also likely to be a higher ratio of travel to contact time in home care due to the rapid reorganisation of rounds and rosters.


8. The dreaded ECM…

It’s become common practice for homecare contracts to use electronic call monitoring (ECM) to create a system of a “pay-per- minute” billing or to round visit times into defined bands have a built in ceiling on upwards adjustment of hours,
 which may make it more difficult to make these rapid adjustments.
The local authorities have on the whole recognised that these need to be removed for this period and all providers should have received communication from their Commissioners.

The “Pay per minute” also carries a significant risk to Providers. In all cases it reduces the financial viability of shorter homecare visits (particularly those that are 30 minutes).



9. Infection Control—The be-all and end-all
As a care provider you will face extra costs through the need for more personal protective equipment (PPE), through the need for enhanced cleaning of care home and other premises or people’s own homes, and through the need to adopt different working patterns to minimise the spread of infection, for example zoning some staff within care homes.
Providers may also face greater difficulty in obtaining infection control products, PPE, handwash and disposable hand towels, due to increased demand for them.
Leaders in these business need to issue clear instructions to their teams about how such stocks should be made available to staff who need them.

All such pressures need to be communicated regularly internally and externally.

10. Don’t forget the self-funders!
Health Care Providers must continue to provide support to self-funders,
It is important that this is communicated to commissioners so that they have an overall picture of how the whole market is operating,
rather just those providers with which an authority contract’s directly.
It’s possible that Health Care Providers may face pressures from sudden decisions by self-funders to refuse support and then refuse to pay notice periods.
It’s important that Health Care Providers keep communicating with Commissioners to give them a closer view of the issues and challenges so that they can support all Health and Social Care providers operationally and financially to ensure resilience through this period.

Thank you once again to all Care Providers and your teams for  your hard work and continued commitment  We are certainly in an extraordinary situation we wish you all the best to be able to mitigate the impacts of Covid-19 on your staff, clients  and your business.




2. Business Continuity Plans – this is No Longer about a “Tick Box” exercise

Good business continuity planning assists resilience and should therefore be in place. The business continuity plan (BCP) need to be updated and worked on in a collaborative way rather than in Silos.

Every Leader within the business should have their own action and Business Continuity Plans that is produced as a working document and not as a “Tick Box” Document.

I would suggest and generally encourage Board Members and Executives within a business that they should if possible, avoid routine information requests unless there is an intention to analyse the plans and offer constructive guidance.

We need to recognise that some aspects of the plans rely on support from others such as Heads of IT, the Finance Team and possibly outside partners as well.

Where it’s deemed possible – a provider should also offer help to peers – other care providers by discussing/sharing their own local resilience plans and discussing any wider considerations such as transport or school closures.





3. Cashflow is King:
We need to recognise that reduced cash flow will especially impact home care providers, as they are usually expected to submit itemised invoices of hours delivered for each person.
In such cases there may be a time lag of up to eight weeks between delivery of support and payment to the provider.
Delays in invoicing, invoice disputes and non- payment of invoices will have a serious negative impact on providers’ cashflow – The providers finance Team need to plan quickly and manage in detail daily and weekly activity.

In this period there are some local authorities that have offered some structured upfront payment

If you as the provider are lucky enough to get an upfront payment then this needs to monitored to ensure the hours delivered tally with the hours paid as this can easily get out of sync.


Cashflow can also affect Residential Care Homes,  it may be possible that local government will offer support by paying on the planned support for people in given care homes and the reconciling for any adjustments due to deaths or other factors. This is even more important as occupancy levels may become more volatile, with potentially more voids due to infection control measures possible offset by extra demand.


4. Retrospective reconciliation – It’s going to happen!
Any payments overpaid will be reconciled - Where the time comes this needs to be handled transparently and with open and frank discussion.

Reconciliation is likely when actual levels of support differ markedly from what was planned and these needs to managed in the budgets of all providers.

All Health Care Providers should be mindful of all the extra costs they are incurring during this period, and of problems they may face in reducing variable costs in such a volatile operating environment.

As a Provider you should also be mindful that, where actual support levels are significantly below plan, then the commissioners may have needed to fund support elsewhere.


5. Sick Pay- the changing landscape
Health Care Providers face increased cost pressures due to higher sickness absence rates among their workforce: you may need to pay staff Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) or make sickness payments at a higher level than SSP because they have a contractual sick pay scheme (also known as an ‘occupational scheme’), which offer workers payments above the basic minimum amount of SSP, which is £94.25 per week.

When emergency legislation is passed, employers’ liability for SSP will start at day one rather than day four, and requirements for workers to self-isolate will further increase financial pressures. Given that in virtually all cases providers will have to backfill sickness absence to ensure continued delivery of support, this represents a real cost pressure on providers.

Please note that care provider employers are unable to reclaim payments for SSP from Government, except for some temporary arrangements announced in the Spring Budget, which will only be available to organisations with 250 or fewer employees.

Our suggestion is that Health Care Provider should lobby to mitigate this by requesting funding for these extra costs and push for either a lump sum payment or through increasing the fee rate.
It’s possible that the local authority can assist with cash flow by agreeing a reasonable amount based on an assumed average sickness absence rate and paying upfront, rather than awaiting detailed records of actual sickness taken and backfill provided and agree reasonable and proportionate ways of later reconciliation. Each Local authority will have their own approach and this issue needs to be highlighted to get this resolved.


6. Workforce availability  & Management
There is no doubt that Health Care Providers will face higher workforce absence rates, through medically recommended self-isolation, sickness and family caring responsibilities.
Other factors, such as the possibility of school closures, may exacerbate this issue. Care providers will need to be able to deploy their staff flexibly and to hire new staff quickly. It’s possible that you may face increased cost pressures from higher use of agency staff.

My suggestion is that here again the Local authority should be lobbied and made aware to assist with these extra cost pressures.
Some Commissioner are allowing flexibility for providers in hiring and deploying staff, for example allowing recruits to begin working after a DBS Adult First check has been obtained, rather than insisting the full DBS checks are returned before a worker can begin providing care, or by allowing staff to be deployed across different care settings or between care providers.


7. Rapid  Response & Adjustment of Support
Generally, support will have to be rapidly adjusted. People will be admitted to hospital, care visits changed to meet the most urgent needs and some homecare visits will take longer due to infection control precautions and the availability of staff.  In addition, care homes may need to adjust support in order to meet changing needs and to minimise infection risks.
This means that rapid decisions will need to be taken by care providers about appropriate adjustments of care packages. This will likely increase your costs as it will require extra management time to make these adjustments. There is also likely to be a higher ratio of travel to contact time in home care due to the rapid reorganisation of rounds and rosters.


8. The dreaded ECM…

It’s become common practice for homecare contracts to use electronic call monitoring (ECM) to create a system of a “pay-per- minute” billing or to round visit times into defined bands have a built in ceiling on upwards adjustment of hours,
 which may make it more difficult to make these rapid adjustments.
The local authorities have on the whole recognised that these need to be removed for this period and all providers should have received communication from their Commissioners.

The “Pay per minute” also carries a significant risk to Providers. In all cases it reduces the financial viability of shorter homecare visits (particularly those that are 30 minutes).


9. Infection Control—The be-all and end-all
As a care provider you will face extra costs through the need for more personal protective equipment (PPE), through the need for enhanced cleaning of care home and other premises or people’s own homes, and through the need to adopt different working patterns to minimise the spread of infection, for example zoning some staff within care homes.
Providers may also face greater difficulty in obtaining infection control products, PPE, handwash and disposable hand towels, due to increased demand for them.
Leaders in these business need to issue clear instructions to their teams about how such stocks should be made available to staff who need them.

All such pressures need to be communicated regularly internally and externally.

10. Don’t forget the self-funders!
Health Care Providers must continue to provide support to self-funders,
It is important that this is communicated to commissioners so that they have an overall picture of how the whole market is operating,
rather just those providers with which an authority contract’s directly.
It’s possible that Health Care Providers may face pressures from sudden decisions by self-funders to refuse support and then refuse to pay notice periods.
It’s important that Health Care Providers keep communicating with Commissioners to give them a closer view of the issues and challenges so that they can support all Health and Social Care providers operationally and financially to ensure resilience through this period.

Thank you once again to all Care Providers and your teams for  your hard work and continued commitment  We are certainly in an extraordinary situation we wish you all the best to be able to mitigate the impacts of Covid-19 on your staff, clients  and your business.


Safaraz Ali